It’s a little silly coming from the country herding Tibetans like cattle and who filled in the contested sea between Hong Kong and Borneo for military installations.
I think this provides support to a hypothesis I’ve had about the anti-China libs. If they aren’t constantly reminded that Xinjiang exists, they just forget about it. “Tibet” and “Tibetans” are much easier to spell than “Xinjiang” and “Uyghur” so when they aren’t constantly reminded of the latest BigEvil China is doing they just default to Tibet.
Radio Free Asia isn’t a news organisation. They’re a rumour-mill run by the USA to generate bad vibes surrounding China and the USAs other enemies in Asia. They’re less credible than The Onion.
globalsecurity.org and Radio Free Asia both passed the independent organization “Media Bias Fact Check” with flying colors for factual reporting, although the latter has a very slight center-left liberal bias.
Is that what the ‘C’ in CIA stands for, ‘centre-left’?
You know Aria was being literal, right? That RFA, with RFE, and VOA are CIA outlets? Funded through the NED (which also funds many more outlets but to a lesser extent). RFA isn’t in any sense a ‘news’ organisations at all. The impressive thing is that Media Fact Check Bias apparently isn’t capable of distinguishing real media from fake. That’s a bigger problem than bias.
So what you’re saying is “Media Bias Fact Check” is extremely biased and can’t tell fact from fiction (or are knowingly lying). Good to know. Thanks! Now i can mark them off as liberal propaganda and know that reality is likely the complete opposite of whatever they say about a media source.
It’s a little silly coming from the country herding Tibetans like cattle and who filled in the contested sea between Hong Kong and Borneo for military installations.
What are you talking about?
I think this provides support to a hypothesis I’ve had about the anti-China libs. If they aren’t constantly reminded that Xinjiang exists, they just forget about it. “Tibet” and “Tibetans” are much easier to spell than “Xinjiang” and “Uyghur” so when they aren’t constantly reminded of the latest BigEvil China is doing they just default to Tibet.
https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/news/2022/02/mil-220218-rfa02.htm
From 2018 to now, several Temples across Western China have been evicted and some monks have been executed on the spot.
Radio Free Asia isn’t a news organisation. They’re a rumour-mill run by the USA to generate bad vibes surrounding China and the USAs other enemies in Asia. They’re less credible than The Onion.
globalsecurity.org and Radio Free Asia both passed the independent organization “Media Bias Fact Check” with flying colors for factual reporting, although the latter has a very slight center-left liberal bias.
This is beautiful, thanks.
Is that what the ‘C’ in CIA stands for, ‘centre-left’?
You know Aria was being literal, right? That RFA, with RFE, and VOA are CIA outlets? Funded through the NED (which also funds many more outlets but to a lesser extent). RFA isn’t in any sense a ‘news’ organisations at all. The impressive thing is that Media Fact Check Bias apparently isn’t capable of distinguishing real media from fake. That’s a bigger problem than bias.
Lmao
You think it’s corrupt americas all the way down, eh?
We should frame this somewhere
This [pointing at lemmygrads tagline] is where I’d frame this, if we had taglines.
So what you’re saying is “Media Bias Fact Check” is extremely biased and can’t tell fact from fiction (or are knowingly lying). Good to know. Thanks! Now i can mark them off as liberal propaganda and know that reality is likely the complete opposite of whatever they say about a media source.
Now I have seen it all.
Out of curiosity, are the Chinese bots reporting me a lot, sir?
yeah and who exactly made that test? lmfao
Media Bias Fact check has no methodology whatsoever and was proven to be unreliable and biased themselves.
Proven by who?
Y’all just be saying anything
“Free Tibet” Mao already did it.
Lib alert, paging MSS