• 520
    link
    fedilink
    55 months ago

    The parents are on trial for manslaughter because they gave their kid a gun like you might give your kid an action figure, with zero restrictions or teaching about respect for life whatsoever. There is a right way to handle kid’s access to guns and many wrong ways.

    • @MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -1
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yes, and you fucking morons keep saying that as if ANYONE is saying we’d want to take THOSE guns. You fucking idiots are using the context to get offended instead of using it to understand what is being asked for.

      Stop being offended over something not even being asked for here. It’s pathetic.

      • 520
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        Calm down and stop using straw man arguments. The only one acting offended here is you.

        • @MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -2
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Yes, because ypu morons keep acting as if I said, “yea, we should clearly restrict all guns from all children at all times.”

          Learn to fucking read before you all go on and on about responsible gun ownership. WE KNOW!! We’re not talking about responsible gun owners. The entire topic has never been about responsible gun owners having any rights removed. “evaluated” does not mean, “take guns”, ffs.

          • 520
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Why don’t you learn to read?

            Because I was actually fucking agreeing with you.

            Yes, IMO these parents do need to be, as you put it, evaluated, so that we can tell apart the responsible tutors from the irresponsible asshats like the woman who got charged.

            We have evaluation systems for firearms literally everywhere else in the world. Fuck, in the US, you have evaluation systems for cars but not fucking guns.