A group of Democratic senators called on the Biden administration Tuesday to completely deschedule marijuana, arguing the White House’s recommendations to the Drug Enforcement Administration …
it takes no genius to simply search for answers and know that weed is linked to poor development if consumed during adolescence, and it also takes no genius to see how retarded frequent smokers of it get when they cant get any
I didn’t say people act totally normal after they smoke weird. You said, and I quote ‘and it also takes no genius to see how retarded frequent smokers of it get when they cant get any’. That is a generalization that is not true.
I know people who lived in states where it wasn’t legal, and would drive 2.5 hours to get it. But, I also know people who had professional jobs and managed large teams who smoke regularly and are very responsible. Your argument makes no sense.
It’s almost like everybody is different and you are extrapolating information you think applies to everyone when it doesn’t.
it takes no genius to simply search for answers and know that weed is linked to poor development if consumed during adolescence, and it also takes no genius to see how retarded frequent smokers of it get when they cant get any
Nobody is advocating for giving weed to children in this thread…
And you’re argument about frequent smokers being ‘retarded’ isn’t even true. I know plenty of people who smoke. You’re just making stuff up.
and i’ve seen many more people who act retarded over it than who smoke it and manage to remain normal-appearing, i’d reckon you’re making stuff up
If people are normal appearing you just assume they havent had any weed.
you’re too blunted down to know that normal is normal in behaviour
What
try reading
I assume theres a typo or missing word, telling me normal is normal…isnt saying anything.
sorry, let me put this in braindead terms, “normal = normal in behaviour”
I didn’t say people act totally normal after they smoke weird. You said, and I quote ‘and it also takes no genius to see how retarded frequent smokers of it get when they cant get any’. That is a generalization that is not true.
I know people who lived in states where it wasn’t legal, and would drive 2.5 hours to get it. But, I also know people who had professional jobs and managed large teams who smoke regularly and are very responsible. Your argument makes no sense.
It’s almost like everybody is different and you are extrapolating information you think applies to everyone when it doesn’t.
people who drink the occasional beer don’t go all postal when they cant get any immediately
Neither do weed smokers. But reality doesn’t mean anything to your arguments because they’re not based in reality to start with.
Define: confirmation bias
define: make a real arguement
No
thought not :)