@Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 6 months agoIs it time for 6G already? Traffic analysis says yepwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square123fedilinkarrow-up1196arrow-down139cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.orghackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1157arrow-down1external-linkIs it time for 6G already? Traffic analysis says yepwww.theregister.com@Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 6 months agomessage-square123fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.orghackernews@derp.foo
minus-squareMeeechlinkfedilinkEnglish9•6 months agoIf they’re going to skip anything, it’s going to be 8… Because 7, 8, 9!
minus-square@Hule@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish5•6 months agoI mean, you might have a point there. If seven ate nine, but you skip eight, it’s all OK! Seven nine. But… But… Seven ate nine. You ate eight! Seven nine! Waaaahhh!
minus-square@ridethisbike@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish5•6 months agoNah dude… That’s why they skipped 9 because 7 ate it. 9 was never a viable option
If they’re going to skip anything, it’s going to be 8… Because 7, 8, 9!
I mean, you might have a point there.
If seven ate nine, but you skip eight, it’s all OK! Seven nine.
But… But… Seven ate nine.
You ate eight!
Seven nine!
Waaaahhh!
Nah dude… That’s why they skipped 9 because 7 ate it. 9 was never a viable option