• @TheMightyHUG@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      379 months ago

      During the cold war, the US armed and supported radical islamist factions called mujihadeen because they were opposed to the communists. This didn’t help, but ofc there were other factors. When the US began its wars in the middle east in earnest, they killed a lot of people including civilians. As a consequence, they were probably the most effective recruiters for radical islam (when a foreign government kills your friends or family, you’d feel positively incluned towards fundamentalist groups fighting them too). Throughout the iraq war and the related conflicts analysts warned that us intervention was fuelling islamic terror. I was under the impression that by now this was common knowledge.

      • TheLastOfHisName
        link
        fedilink
        99 months ago

        I recommend the book “Charlie Wilson’s War” for those who want some insight into the funding of the Mujahideen.

      • @teichflamme@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -29 months ago

        What an ignorant take. Radical Islam existed long before the US went there. Salafism and Wahhabism have been around for more then century at this point, to name two of several fundamentalist movements.

        Muslims have been infighting with fundamentalists and more secular members of Islam for centuries.

        The US surely didn’t help, but they are so, so far from being the sole or main cause for the turmoil in Afghanistan and the middle east in general.

    • @Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      79 months ago

      For a big part, yes. Overthrowing democratic governments, funding radicals and bombing civillians tends to make people join the side that is seen as the enemies of the culprits of these crimes.