Supreme Court to decide whether to restrict abortion drug nationwide | CNN Politics
www.cnn.com
The Supreme Court said Wednesday it will consider whether to restrict access to a widely used abortion drug — even in states where the procedure is still allowed.

The Supreme Court said Wednesday it will consider whether to restrict access to a widely used abortion drug — even in states where the procedure is still allowed.

The case concerns the drug mifepristone that — when coupled with another drug — is one of the most common abortion methods in the United States.

The decision means the conservative-leaning court will again wade into the abortion debate after overturning Roe v. Wade last year, altering the landscape of abortion rights nationwide and triggering more than half the states to outlaw or severely restrict the procedure.

  • roguetrick
    2•7 months ago

    There’s just no grounds here. If it was bad faith, outside the power delegated, against the Constitution, sure. If it’s within their power and following their rules (good faith), the court has zero place.

    The idea that they’re acting in bad faith because the court interprets the evidence differently than the agency put together to interpret the evidence is a ridiculous argument.

    • BuelldozerA
      1•7 months ago

      If it’s within their power and following their rules (good faith)

      That’s the issue before SCOTUS! It’s being claimed that the FDA didn’t follow its own procedure when relaxing the prescription and dispensing rules for mifepristone.

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
        1•6 months ago

        Right, it’s a bullshit, bad faith lawsuit, funded by far right extremists. Twenty years is too late. Statutes of limitations, statutes of repose, laches. Fifth Circuit is on crack.

        • BuelldozerA
          1•6 months ago

          Twenty years is too late.

          Yes, which is why I think SCOTUS didn’t grant a writ of Certiorari for it. The argument about mifepristone’s FDA approval is dead.

    • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
      0•7 months ago

      They aren’t interpreting the same evidence. The court isn’t ruling on the science.

      The issue is stated as:

      Issue: (1) Whether the Alliance’s challenge to the Food and Drug Administration’s 2000 mifepristone approval is timely; and (2) whether FDA’s 2000 approval of mifepristone under 21 C.F.R. 314.500, which applies only to drugs that “treat[ ] serious or life-threatening illnesses,” and FDA’s subsequent approval of generic mifepristone were unlawful.

      • BuelldozerA
        1•7 months ago

        The court isn’t ruling on the science.

        Correct, they are ruling on the matter of whether or not the FDA followed its own processes as it relaxed restrictions around the prescribing, dispensing, and use of mifepristone.

        FTFA:

        “Though the justices on Wednesday agreed to consider an appeals court decision that restricted access to the drug, they declined a separate appeal by the abortion foes to consider if the FDA’s 2000 approval of the drug was unlawful.”

        The question of mifepristone’s legality isn’t before the court and it becoming illegal or banned isn’t even a remotely possible outcome.

        Edit: You can read it for yourself direct from SCOTUS here. The Alliance petition for a writ of certiorari on 23-395 was denied.