• @OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    -47 months ago

    Is this meant to be a gotcha? What I prefer has nothing to do with understanding how states function and why they coalesce.

    • @PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Not really a gotcha. I just forget I’m pretty alone in my (particular) distaste for violence.

      Edit: didn’t really mean for that to sound so negative.

      • @OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        -47 months ago

        I guess I dont base my understanding of politics around morality, morality enters the field when determining what to do within that understanding

        • @PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          I’m certainly overly reductive of politics. When we’re talking ideology, though, yeah I’m going back to my ethics. A government can’t act on our behalf with more rights than us - we just end up creating our master. Pragmatic actions, in the real world, are different from ideological conversations, though.

          • @OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            -37 months ago

            I’m somewhat confused by your separation of ideology from practical actions. That sounds internally inconsistent.

            I am willing to accept a state if it is necessary to suppress the bourgeoisie and their toadies, so long as that continues to be necessary. I would prefer we lived in a communist society but we can’t get there overnight and socialism is how you transition to it.

            • @PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              17 months ago

              It’s similar to your position. I just have a different path to a stateless, voluntary society. I also don’t really care what the economic system looks like, so long as human rights are recognized.

              • @OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                -37 months ago

                I also don’t really care what the economic system looks like, so long as human rights are recognized.

                What about human economic rights? What use does a homeless starving person have for the freedom of press?

                • @PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  17 months ago

                  I consider freedom of the press to just be freedom of speech, which we all have.

                  As for the homeless chap, it depends on their situation. I’d live in a community that would try to help them. I think we’re ethically obligated to help people in need as best we can, but I’m not comfortable using violence to force you to help them.

                  • @OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -37 months ago

                    I consider freedom of the press to just be freedom of speech, which we all have.

                    The thing is we don’t. There is no such thing as free speech, any speech that meaningfully threatens the government will be cracked down on. See Fred Hampton. Free speech is a legal fiction in our country.

                    But my point is that the limited bourgeois privileges you get don’t matter if you’re starving on the street. You can’t meaningfully have those privileges without economic security.

                    As for the homeless chap, it depends on their situation. I’d live in a community that would try to help them. I think we’re ethically obligated to help people in need as best we can, but I’m not comfortable using violence to force you to help them.

                    So it is more violent to take food from a grocery store because that hurts the owners bottom line than it is to prevent a starving man from taking bread from a grocery store by kicking his ass and throwing him in a box? Is that your perspective on this issue?