• @LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    257 months ago

    Eh, that at least goes back to the days of dial-up (at least).

    56k modem connections were 7k bytes or less.

    The drive thing confused and angered many cause most OSs of the time (and even now) report binary kilobytes (kiB) as kB which technically was incorrect as k is an SI prefix for 1000 (10^3) not the binary unit of 1024 (2^10).

    Really they should have advertised both on the boxes.

    I think Mac OS switched to reporting data in kilobibytes (kiB) vs kB since Mac OS 10.6.

    I remember folks at the time thinking the new update was so efficient it had grown their drive space by 10%!

    • @accideath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      67 months ago

      While macOS did indeed primarily switch to KiB, MiB and Gib, it does at times still report storage as KB, MB, GB, etc., however it uses the (correct) 1000B = 1KB

      And afaik, Linux also uses the same (correct) system, at least most of the time.

      The only real outlier is Windows, which still uses the old system with KB = 1024B, some of the time. In certain menus, they do correctly use KiB

      • @Eheran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Please note that kilo is a small k. n, μ, m, k, M, G, T, …

        And yes. A lot of people here get at least one of those wrong.

        • @accideath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          37 months ago

          While you are correct, I know no operating system that doesn’t capitalize the K. At the very least not consistently.

            • @accideath@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              I guess it’s for consistency. M, G and T are all capital and n, p or μ aren’t relevant for bits and bytes. Makes sense to also capitalize the k.

              Edit: In case of kbps and Mbps, the capitalization is usually correct though…