• @PepeLivesMatter
    link
    1
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Meanwhile, men have for a long time been the ones responsible for putting food on the table, paying the rent, building houses, cars, etc. and maintaining them, going to war to defend the country, mowing the lawn, and keeping society running.

    Also, hilarious of you to accuse me of misogyny and then basically saying “women are responsible for doing traditionally female jobs”. LOL.

    LMAO, even.

      • @PepeLivesMatter
        link
        17 months ago

        Perhaps in the past, but nowadays women are totally free to become soldiers, farmers, butchers, construction workers, electricians, bus drivers, or garbage collectors. Yet all of those jobs are still overwhelmingly done by men. And if men didn’t do them, there would be no houses, no roads, no electricity, and no food.

        • DroneRights [it/its]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          Men sexually harass women who do those things in the workplace, and they still have to cook your food and wipe your bum when they get home

          • @PepeLivesMatter
            link
            17 months ago

            No, they do not. Women do not have to stay in abusive relationships. They can go to court and get a restraining order, a divorce, or sue their employer if they are harassed at the workplace. No one is forcing them to stay in these types of situations. If they chose to do so anyways, they have no one but themselves to blame.

            • DroneRights [it/its]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Ah, the good old “systemic oppression doesn’t exist because free will”

              Next you’re gonna say women who are forced by the state to carry pregnancies to term can just choose not to raise their kids

              • @PepeLivesMatter
                link
                17 months ago

                They can always give their children up for adoption, can’t they?

                • DroneRights [it/its]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  17 months ago

                  What you’re failing to understand is that normal people are bound by moral standards of decent behaviour.

                  • @PepeLivesMatter
                    link
                    07 months ago

                    So you’re saying it’s immoral to give up a child for adoption when you are unable to raise it, but it’s not immoral to abort it before it even has a chance to take its first breath?