8GB RAM on M3 MacBook Pro ‘Analogous to 16GB’ on PCs, Claims Apple::Following the unveiling of new MacBook Pro models last week, Apple surprised some with the introduction of a base 14-inch MacBook Pro with M3 chip,…

  • @Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    168 months ago

    Since 1990.

    I remember their CPU cycles were “worth more”.

    They also always cheapens out on stuff, even when they used “PC” hardware, CPU from 4 years ago etc and RAM & HDD/SSD were so small you basicallyhad to buy a “next tier” machine (much more expensive).

    • @superschurke@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      58 months ago

      I remember their CPU cycles were “worth more”.

      But this exists… There’s still differences amongst PC CPUs in per-cycle performance…

      • @Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        38 months ago

        Sure, but their claim was just bullshit back then.

        They did optimise Photoshop wildly for Mac to try to show they were right IIRC.

    • @uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      08 months ago

      It is not theirs, it is IBM’s. Or rather Freescale’s, now bought out by NXP. Was true at the time.