ijeff to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 8 months agoOne year after being bought for $44 billion, X is worth $19 billionarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square188fedilinkarrow-up11.13Karrow-down155cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
arrow-up11.08Karrow-down1external-linkOne year after being bought for $44 billion, X is worth $19 billionarstechnica.comijeff to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 8 months agomessage-square188fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
minus-square@dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish18•8 months agoIs this the wikipedia-argument back at him? The whole twitter post history could fit on a single hard drive, so why are people paying for it?
minus-square@wildginger@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkEnglish7•8 months agoThat argument is unfair anyway, cause what fits on a hard drive gets bigger every year.
minus-square@CleoTheWizard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish4•8 months agoNo it’s completely fair because the value of information deflates as we gain better ability to store it! /s
minus-square@Meowoem@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish1•8 months agoAnd there’s endless examples of a small well ordered thing being far more expensive than essentially the same thing less ordered in bigger volume - a room full of carbon dioxide, a bag of coal, a diamond…
Is this the wikipedia-argument back at him? The whole twitter post history could fit on a single hard drive, so why are people paying for it?
That argument is unfair anyway, cause what fits on a hard drive gets bigger every year.
No it’s completely fair because the value of information deflates as we gain better ability to store it! /s
And there’s endless examples of a small well ordered thing being far more expensive than essentially the same thing less ordered in bigger volume - a room full of carbon dioxide, a bag of coal, a diamond…