• @rdri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -89 months ago

    There can be no context for violence that hamas has shown recently, solely because it was aimed for citizens who did nothing to them. Anyone who doesn’t understand this also has to answer how exactly this helped anyone anywhere, other than accepting that hamas only wanted to kill more Israeli with no meaningful purpose in mind.

    • @Killing_Spark@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      69 months ago

      Right, that’s one way to deal with Terror, ignoring the reasons the terrorists became that way and killing everyone close to them to avoid new terrorists.

      • @rdri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -3
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        What reasons? You can’t reason with people who want to kill and create terrorists out of their own citizens. They have the internet so they could at least educate themselves on how history and terrorism work, how they could live fine as is, without resorting to violence. How they will not live fine if they practice terrorism.

        Propose a better way to deal with terrorism, or just accept the reality.

        • @Killing_Spark@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          49 months ago

          how they could live fine as is, without resorting to violence. How they will not live fine if they practice terrorism.

          Well that’s quite literally not true. People in Gaza can not “live fine as is” because they are cut off from the whole world, relying on an enemy nation to allow humanitarian aid to be delivered. People in the Westbank aren’t allowed to use their own land because Israel is keeping it occupied and keeps building settlements.

          You can’t reason with people who want to kill and create terrorists out of their own citizens

          This is true, but kinda unrelated to what I said. I said there are reasons people become terrorists. Whether or not you can still reason with them after that point of radicalization is not what I was arguing.

          Propose a better way to deal with terrorism, or just accept the reality.

          “Either solve an unsolvable problem, or accept that bombing civilians is an acceptable solution” isn’t really an argument, it can be turned around to justify the terror the Hamas is spreading: “Propose a better way to deal with the occupation of our land and the killing of our people, or just accept the reality”. It’s just an absurd.

          • @rdri@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            People in Gaza can not “live fine as is” because they are cut off from the whole world, relying on an enemy nation to allow humanitarian aid to be delivered.

            Well guess what doing terrorism will bring them? Certainly not getting new connections in the world. If they wanted to do anything positive, they wouldn’t build rockets in the first place.

            I said there are reasons people become terrorists. Whether or not you can still reason with them after that point of radicalization is not what I was arguing.

            The reason being: hamas propaganda. You can’t justify those reasons. They need to be rectified properly. Israel existence is not one of those reasons.

            “Propose a better way to deal with the occupation of our land and the killing of our people, or just accept the reality”.

            Accept all the help from the world you can get, and do the rest yourself. Build infrastructure, hospitals, universities etc., not rockets. Just stop being terrorists and making more terrorists.