Kagi is a paid alternative to ad-supported search engines like Google and DuckDuckGo. It has recently revised its pricing model, reducing the cost for a plan with unmetered searches from $25 per month to $10.

Kagi boasts the following (and more) features:

  • Blocking or boosting specific domains in your search results
  • “Lenses”, which are individual setting profiles (e.g. region locks, domain whitelists) that can be applied to search queries
  • All of the Bangs that DuckDuckGo has (e.g. type “!yt” in front of your query to immediately search on youtube.com)
  • Universal Summarizer, which works with any website, PDF document, YouTube video and more

This blog post goes into full details about Kagi’s capabilities.

  • @lloram239@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    11
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    For one, it’s based in the USA, so it is legally subject to the insane, antidemocratic, and awful state surveillance there.

    https://kagi.com/privacy at least sounds pretty good.

    It is also a corporation, so it is subject to enshittification.

    https://blog.kagi.com/safe-round this sound good as well.

    The part that I don’t get is how they can match Google in terms of search results quality when Microsoft couldn’t even get close with Bing and a heck of a lot more time and money.

    • PenguinCoder
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Easy. Kagi cares about the quality of their product giving you the customer good results. Their product is a search engine. Google doesn’t care to make their search engine better currently. Their product is ad placement and sales. You are not their customer.

      Kagi already exceeds Google at being a search engine, at this time.

    • @1984
      link
      69 months ago

      Don’t think you will find a better search engine than Kagi. They can’t even see what queries users are running, according to their own comments.

      • @douglasg14b@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        39 months ago

        That’d be weird if they couldn’t, there’s no way they can improve their search engine other than by watching the way users use it.

        Otherwise it exists in a vacuum.

        • @1984
          link
          29 months ago

          I would guess they mean that they can’t see which queries belong to which users.