The logical end of the ‘Solution to bad speech is better speech’ has arrived in the age of state-sponsored social media propaganda bots versus AI-driven bots arguing back

  • @orrk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -19 months ago

    9/11 only had its effect because they hit the twin towers, chemical weapons can kill entire areas

    • @thenightisdark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      49 months ago

      I don’t understand the point you’re making. If airplanes hitting a building can do the same damages chemical weapons…

      Chemical weapons can kill entire areas just like planes hitting buildings. I’m a licensed pilot.

      • @orrk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -19 months ago

        what killed people was the damage to the buildings not the planes themselves, if the twin towers had been a chemical plant (especially one making something like phosgene, mustard gas or chlorine gas) in the middle of NY, the death toll would have made 9/11 look like a wet fart

        • @thenightisdark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 months ago

          The chemical plant cannot be a WMD.

          Places cannot be WMD. This is inherent in the word weapon a weapon is not a place. The w in WMD makes it not a place

          • @orrk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            hey, I was arguing with the logic of planes are a WMD because 9/11, pointing out that if plans would be a WMD because the WTC towers collapsing killing a lot of people, a chemical plant would be way worse.

            but in effect a plane is not much different from the larger cruise missiles