• Tiger666@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      If someone calls themselves an anarcho-capitalist, I immediately think that person is of very low IQ trying to sound smart and educated.

      At least the term libertarianism isn’t a contradiction, even if it is selfish and stupid.

      Sure, no kings, no masters but when you don’t go the extra step to understand where the kings and masters come from, then you are just a useful idiot to the next fascist that comes along.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        yeah except libertarians love kings and masters, they just want it to be private and not collective. because they think they’re going to be kings and masters in such a society. and it’s always the most miserable looking dweeb because that’s usually the motivation behind the fantasy.

        • Pnut@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          To translate your message: “Libertarians wrongly believe they are kings and masters.” Evidenced by the famous Highlander line “There can be only one!”

          I mean. You already pay for your road and the ambulance that can drive down it to save your life. Why would you pay more to utilise the same overburdened service? Unless you’re going to pay to build a hospital, fire station, etc. what’s the point? And then the maintenance bills. Libertarians cannot wait to spend all of their money on things we currently help them pay for. (I’m Canadian by the way, just to explain the paid ambulance part)