• AmbiguousProps
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    2 days ago

    It largely depends on the location. For example, in the PNW, especially Western Washington and Oregon, people are very aware of that fact. Many around here are arming, protesting, and becoming more and more self sufficient.

    For their part, the Washington State government has sued the Trump administration multiple times, and for now, has blocked some of the executive orders in federal court. Of course, that depends on Trump following court orders, which as we know, he’s more than willing to ignore.

    Meanwhile in states like Utah (where some of my family lives), they still have their heads in the sand, and don’t seem to be bothered. Not to generalize, because some people there are aware, but they’re outnumbered by the ignorant public there. Many people there who are aware are either trapped due to financial reasons or are actively trying to leave for blue states.

    I have seen that some GOP voters are starting to feel the financial burn, but most of them still try to blame it on Biden.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      This doesn’t seem to be actually answering the question. The question was about how the US was perceived by other countries, not how Americans perceive their own government.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Are people in the US

          Yes, go on…

          aware that they are now definitely a rogue state

          The question isn’t your awareness of what the government is doing. It’s your awareness of how the US is perceived by the rest of the world. A rogue state is “a nation that is considered very dangerous to other nations”. To answer that question, you have to reference other nations views on the US.

          • AmbiguousProps
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            I don’t think I agree, and many in the thread didn’t get that idea. People outside of the US are obviously aware, the title is clearly asking if people inside of the United States are aware. Why would someone outside of the US have to ask if people outside of the US are aware? It makes no sense.

            also (emphasis mine):

            people in the US aware that they are a rogue state

            It makes no grammatical sense if they’re asking about opinions outside of the US.

            • merc@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              How can you be this confused?

              You’re basically proving the point of this meme.

              The question is basically “Are Americans aware of how the world perceives them?”

              Possible answers to that question are: “Yes, I read DW news in English, and BBC news too. I’m aware of how the world perceives the US.” Or “No, I can imagine how the world must view the US, but I only read US news so I can only guess.”

              • AmbiguousProps
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 hours ago

                I don’t think I’m the confused one here, to be honest with you, as shown by the other answers and upvotes in this thread. You do not have to specify non-US news to know that we’re a rogue state - plenty of US media reports on it all the same. The question is clearly asking if Americans are aware that they’re now a rogue state, and I answered appropriately.

                It seems like maybe you don’t want that to be the case, but my answer still stands: Yes, many Americans, especially in the PNW, are very aware of that fact. Americans in red states [the ones who watch Fox news especially] have their heads in the sand. You do not need to consume any media at all to be aware of that fact, it helps, but you don’t require it to acknowledge it.

                I fully understand and acknowledge that we’re seen as a rogue state externally, and am painfully aware, as is much of the PNW. It’s the red states that think “we’re the best country in the world, and in fact, the only one that matters”, which is exactly what my first comment was describing. People in blue states are rightfully embarrassed and are trying to distance themselves from the federal government for precisely this reason.

                • merc@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  I don’t think I’m the confused one here, to be honest with you, as shown by the other answers and upvotes in this thread

                  Yes, other people were confused. That doesn’t mean that you’re not confused.

                  The question is clearly asking if Americans are aware that they’re now a rogue state, and I answered appropriately.

                  No, what you answered was “How do Americans feel about being a rogue state?” That’s a completely different question, even though it’s the one most people answered.

                  I fully understand and acknowledge that we’re seen as a rogue state externally

                  The question was whether Americans in general understood and acknowledged that. I would say no, because most Americans don’t follow foreign news sources. People who are getting their news from Fox News, OANN and Newsmax are probably not aware of that. Instead, they probably think the US is even more respected than ever.

                  • AmbiguousProps
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 hours ago

                    Once again, this is why I didn’t generalize and said that the PNW is well aware of that fact, and red states have their heads in the sand. I’m not sure how many times I need to say that to make it clear to you that I answered the question appropriately. I specified how Americans are feeling to back my statement of them being aware or not. Do you think the PNW, in general, gets their news from right wing news sources?

    • LuckyPierre@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Of course, that depends on Trump following court orders, which as we know, he’s more than willing to ignore.

      I think that’s been one of the biggest surprises to this European spectator - that justice can be ignored if you’re powerful enough in America.

      We had glimpses of it with the first end-of-term pardons. Then Biden did the same for his son, and Trump released all those who committed treason in his name on his first day of his second term. All those people were fund guilt after due process, but someone can unilaterally say “let them free” and they’re out. I totally understand the lawyer quitting his career when Trump was “pardoned” for his own crimes after being elected. Biggest case of his career, years invested in training and work and he played a blinder - only for it to be turned to nothing.

      So we’ve learned that if you’re rich in the US (because rich == powerful there like nowhere else in the world) then you are untouchable by justice. For a country that was literally born from a civil war, that’s a pretty huge failing of its constitution.

      • monarch@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        To be fair to biden even though his son was guilty there was no way that he was only going to be normally punished. I wouldn’t let my parents be murdered for a drug crime.

    • Lightor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I live in Utah, it’s about 90% people cheering at Trump and 10% very polite demonstrations against the right that are highly criticized. Feels so muted here.

    • hddsx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      The only reason I know this is because I’m only interested in one particular firearm and I want to move to WA, but how are you planning to defend yourself with HB1240 in place?

      I get that in peace time, 10 bullets per mag and no assault weapons is a generally good policy. But what happens MAGA decides to try to take WA by force?

      In the part I haven’t looked up, does WA have a state militia that is not the national guard?

      • vulgarcynic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Additionally, you can purchase “parts” bags/kits which are marketed as “repair accessories” for 11+ rd magazines(usually 30 rds for 5.56 and 7.62). These somehow skirt around the law from my understanding. You’re buying the complete mag, but assemble it yourself.

      • AmbiguousProps
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Not to encourage this as I am not a lawyer, but mags purchased before the bill was enacted are grandfathered in, meaning that you can still own them, you just can’t buy them. So, if you own any already, you’re likely fine as far as I can tell. I know that some people just go to Idaho to buy them and then they bring them back. Definitely illegal, but mags aren’t tracked in any shape or form so they do it.

        The semi automatic rifles themselves, as long as they were registered before the bill passed, were also grandfathered in. I’m not sure if out of state purchases count in that or not, though.

        I don’t believe there’s any sort of official “militia”, but the SRA is very active in the region and may qualify as one.

        • hddsx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I was not a resident when the law passed so I cannot be grandfathered in

      • Darorad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Just get something fairly common and a 10rd compliant mag.

        Much of hb1240 also only applies to sales and imports, but doesn’t ban ownership, so you can still have an ar-15 for example if you buy before you move.

        There’s plenty of higher capacity shit in the rest of the US, if it comes to a point where you need them, they’ll make their way in. Just reach hook up with your local branch of the SRA when you move there.

        WA does have a state guard, but it’s like 50 people iirc.

        • hddsx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I looked into it. If I buy one before I move, as soon as I bring the rifle into WA, it counts as importing.

          What’s the SRA like? I’m not a socialist and am hesitant to be affiliated due to the path the NRA charter

          • Typotyper@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            Lie and deny

            Just buy what you want and shut up about it. Don’t tell or show anyone. If bullets start flying no one will care anymore

          • Darorad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Ah, I didn’t realize that counted as importing, turns out only people who already own one in Washington can bring one in if they previously left the state with it. Guess the answer is either dont do it or don’t get caught. The best answer is to ask a lawyer though. The NRA might have someone you can talk to for free if you’re willing to put up with dealing with them for a little while. Just use a disposable email / phone so they don’t bother you after.

            The SRA varies a lot by chapter, it’s not really a national org in any meaningful way, but both the chapters I’ve done stuff with were pretty welcoming to social democrats. What would you describe yourself as? I might be able to give a better answer.

            My local chapter is a mix of communists, anarchists, and soc dems. We also do open-invite firearm trainings, and have had some liberals show up recently, but none of them have really stuck around.

            If you’re concerned about maga getting violent you’ll find like-minded people in the SRA, at least on that. If you’re open to being in an explicitly leftist space, I’d probably check them out, in case shit does hit the fan, you want to know people you can ally with.