As more and more states pass laws targeting “pornographic material” in books and online, they are repeatedly running up against a problem: The Bible has not just a few passages that could be considered indecent

  • @bitsplease@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    771 year ago

    Spoiler: he’ll completely ignore this comment and just continue to go on saying that all criticisms of conservatives are baseless and unproductive

    • Dark Arc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’ll be honest, the point was less for him and more for lurkers, that might not pay as much attention and might benefit from an outline. I gave up on changing the mind of the person I’m replying to on the internet a long time ago (if it happens great!) … but I want to challenge and cut through the “noise” for the casual observer.

      • @Reptorian@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        That’s the only single reason I debunk conservatives with some of their tactics thrown back at them. In a forum, I’m pretty much am blocked by nearly every conservatives there.

    • @aidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -141 year ago

      He didn’t say that, he criticized generalizing conservatives. I know conservatives who don’t care to block books from school libraries, or block trans students from going to bathrooms in their identified gender- or most of the other “culture war” arguments.

      • @bitsplease@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        151 year ago

        If they feel that way, then why do they vote politicians into power who do those things?

        You don’t get to vote evil people into power and then say “oh no, I don’t support the evil stuff, I just care about the lower taxes”

      • @Vespair@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Yes but until they start actively opposing those policies and demanding their politicians do the same, they are still complicit with these policies as their votes are what enable them. Whether or not they personally believe these things is entirely irrelevant. All that matters are the actions and policies, and every conservative voter is this complicit.

        • @aidan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -31 year ago

          Unfortunately people have different priorities than you or I, I guarantee a politician you have voted for has done something you oppose, and you may have still supported them. That’s because you care more about their other policies.

          • @Vespair@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            False equivalency.

            “We should focus more on corporate taxes rather than individual taxes” is an opinion; “gay people shouldn’t have rights” isn’t an opinion, it’s hate.

            Don’t try to pretend these are on the same level. Supporting American conservatism requires a level of moral bankruptcy.

      • @bitsplease@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        311 year ago

        I don’t need to put any words into your mouth, your reply to the comment was to ignore all the real, objectively true examples and just claim that despite the fact that they’re the actions of real conservative policy makers, that they somehow have nothing to do with real conservative policy

        You ignore the faults of real world conservatism, holding up this idealistic version of conservatism you have in your head as “real” conservatism. Ill bet you also hold that conservatism has nothing to do with anti-LGBT+, despite their policy makers constantly making anti-LGBT+ policy decisions

        • @awwwyissss@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          -351 year ago

          You’re completely ignorant of who I am and you’re reinforcing my initial point that we should be careful about creating an echochamber.

          • @bitsplease@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            211 year ago

            And you’re reinforcing mine by continuing to not actually address any of the actual points.

            Pointing out actual, provable examples of selective enforcement by conservatives isn’t an “echo chamber” it’s discussing real world politics

            Ultimately it looks from my perspective like you’re falling into the classic trap of just assuming that when a lot of people disagree with you, that they’re just mindlessly repeating talking points - rather than ever considering that your own view might be skewed. Further reinforced by the fact that you steadfastly refuse to actually talk about the issue, and instead just keep deflecting and crying “ECHO CHAMBER”.

            And no, I have no idea who you are, why should I care though? This is a discussion about conservative politics, not you or your feelings.

            • @awwwyissss@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              -191 year ago

              You’re trying to say “there are many examples of selective enforcement in conservative laws” and I’m saying “yeah, no shit, I agree with you”

              Meanwhile I’m being attacked for saying it’s important to be reasonable, demonstrating the echo chamber I’m talking about.

              • @bitsplease@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                141 year ago

                So if you agree that what’s being said is factual, then what exactly is the concern here regarding “echo chambers”?

                A echo chamber is dangerous when people are spreading misinformation, a group of people acknowledging a very real negative aspect of a major political party is in no way “echo chamber” type behavior.

                Now if we were saying “all conservative voters and politicians are Nazis”, id agree with you that caution should be given about echo chambers, but cautioning about echo chambers when objective facts are being discussed comes across much more as you trying to deflect away from facts you don’t like being discussed.

                Would it help you if we also talked some trash about democrats?

                Biden is too old for office

                Most elected democrats are hypocrites, at least to some extent

                Virtually every politician, including the left leaning ones, in the US are corrupt to som extent, and usually to a severe degree

                There? Are you satisfied that we’re not an echo chamber?

                • @clutch@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 year ago

                  Not denying that Biden is very old and that any vote for him carries a material probability that it also elects the VP for president, the vast majority of politicians are very old in the USA

                • @aidan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -51 year ago

                  The concern is that you said “conservatives”, not “what’s popular amongst conservative politicians”, or “what’s popular amongst conservative media”, or even “most”. You just said conservatives, that is villifying all people by nature of a describing themselves by a very broad term(or even someone else ascribing it to them). Their initial complaint was generalization and you attacked them with evidence of it being true for some conservatives.

                  • @bitsplease@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    61 year ago

                    Who elects conservative politicians?

                    Who consumes conservative media?

                    Every person who votes conservative is guilty of the behavior I describe because - As pointed out above - they vote in the politicians who do these things

                    You can’t vote a politician into power and then not take responsibility for their actions

      • @CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        281 year ago

        Don’t put words in my mouth or accuse my of something you made up in your mind.

        Translation: I don’t have an argument for any of the things posted so I’m going to accuse a random person of something instead

          • @Vespair@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            91 year ago

            No dude, fuck you and your weasel words and moving goalpost. You made a shit comment and got proven wrong. Now’s the time to gracefully take the L; anything else just makes you look like a jackass.

          • @CADmonkey@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Lol, you prove my point more eloquently than I could have on my own. Well done, and keep getting mad at strangers online it’s probably the best part of your life.