• lemminator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’m not sure what a “consequential” is, but I’m not a Trump supporter, nor am I a conservative. I proudly voted against him.

      • lemminator
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        No they don’t. My words and actions are against Trump. I loudly call him out for being the child-killing, raping, racist that he is. I’m not sure how pointing out that the Democratic leadership openly failed to win a slam dunk election brought you to that conclusion.

        The entire reason I’m angry at them, is that they didn’t bring the fight that was needed to keep him out of the White House.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Your actions support Trump. Your words promote him.

        If you are not on my team, you are the enemy. If you are not on my team hard enough, you are the enemy. If my team does not win it is not their fault, but yours, as you are the enemy.

        Why are people not voting “correctly”? Don’t they know my team are the good guys? Don’t they know they are supposed to like my team?

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I live in a nation with first past the post, its not great but you know what helps? More then two parties. You americans think your broken system is not only common but the standard. It is not.

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Having more than two parties can actually be harmful unless you first change the first past the post, because the parties that hold your stances will have their votes split between them.

              • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                because the parties that hold your stances will have their votes split between them.

                That is a good thing, collation governments actually have to do their jobs. Are you in all seriousness really trying to say having more parties are a bad thing? What in the tribal team speak nonsense is this?

                  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 hours ago

                    Oh? somehow I am on the other team when I don’t agree with you? I am assuming that is what you are implying. Lets just ignore that if you had more then one conservative party it would be good for an astroturfing democrat.