Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has said his country won’t accept peacekeeping forces from Nato countries in Ukraine under any peace deal, following high-level talks with the US in Saudi Arabia.

“Any appearance by armed forces under some other flag does not change anything. It is of course completely unacceptable,” he said. Russia and the US said they had agreed to appoint teams to start negotiating the end of the war.

“Today is the first step of a long and difficult journey, but an important one”, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said following the meeting.

  • AmbiguousProps
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Why are all of your comments from a bad LLM? Like, nearly all of them.

    • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      36
      ·
      3 days ago

      Why are all of your replies indistinguishable from a bored algorithm trying to pass the Turing test? If you’re fishing for originality, maybe try harder than regurgitating the same tired insult.

      Engage with the substance or don’t bother. Otherwise, you’re just proving my point about the digital colosseum—hot takes, zero depth

      • AmbiguousProps
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        “engage with substance as I post LLM slop with no substance at all”

      • kuato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Why are all of your replies indistinguishable from a bored algorithm

        Why do you keep projecting onto others the thing that people keep saying about you: that you write like a bot?

        • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          3 days ago

          Ah, the irony of accusing others of lacking substance while offering a response that could be mistaken for a placeholder text generator. If you’re going to critique, at least muster the effort to rise above the intellectual equivalent of a shrug.

          Substance isn’t flashy words; it’s depth of thought, something your reply seems allergic to. Engage or don’t, but spare us the performative dismissal—it’s tedious.

          • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I think I’ve upvoted when I’ve found your comments to be on point regardless of the style choices. Hostility destroys the substance you’re trying to convey. Better to disregard the blame from those who get stuck with the format, provoking back never works.