• @jaybone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1412 hours ago

    How is the application able to send data to any website? Like even if you as the legit user explicitly asked it to do that?

    • fmstrat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Haven’t read details, but the classic way is to have a system visit: site.com/badimage.gif?data=abcd

      Note: That s is also how things like email open rates are tracked, and how marketers grab info using JavaScript to craft image URLs.

      • @jaybone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        610 hours ago

        This is why every single email client for the past 2+ decades blocks external images? This didn’t occur to the AI geniuses?

        • Eager Eagle
          link
          fedilink
          English
          610 hours ago

          IME they usually proxy and/or prefetch images for caching instead of blocking them. Only spam content is blocked by default.

          • fmstrat
            link
            fedilink
            English
            39 hours ago

            This wouldn’t help, would it? How would you prefetch and cache:

            site.com/base64u-to-niceware-word-array/image.gif

            ? It would look like a normal image URL in any article, but actually represent data.

            Note: “niceware” is a way to convert binary or text data into a set of words like “cow-heart-running-something-etc”.

            • @hedgehog@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              English
              36 hours ago

              If it’s prefetched, it doesn’t matter that you reveal that it’s been “opened,” as that doesn’t reveal anything about the recipient’s behavior, other than that the email was processed by the email server.

              • @undefined@links.hackliberty.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 hours ago

                Personally speaking, I’ve never been a fan of this method because to the hosting web server it was still fetched. That might confirm that an email address exists or (mistakenly) confirm that the user did in fact follow the link (or load the resource).

                I have ad and tracking blocked like crazy (using DNS) so I can’t follow most links in emails anyway. External assets aren’t loaded either, but this method basically circumvents that (which I hate).

                • Eager Eagle
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  9 minutes ago

                  an email for a receiver that doesn’t exist, more often than not, goes back to the sender after e.g. 72h. That’s by design.