• @Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    761 day ago

    Back when we were doing quadratic equations; I wrote a program on my TI-84 that would ask which parts of the equation you already had, and would fill in the rest for you.

    My teacher liked it so much he bought a transfer cable for those calculators so he could get a copy for himself. Then used to to grade tests.

    • @TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      210 hours ago

      I made one to decompose polynomials it was very good because it showed all the steps it was literally just copy what’s on the calc to the page

    • @Khanzarate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      411 day ago

      I did the same thing. It was allowed in general, with the correct thought, “if you can code it yourself, you know the content”

      I had another “program” that would fail to run but that’s because I wrote notes into it. Doubt that was allowed.

        • @sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          620 hours ago

          They did that here too, but students would use a cheat program that made it look like teachers were resetting it, but really the memory was safe

        • @piecat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          Oh I would have been so pissed. I was programming on my calculator 24/7 instead of my classes.

          I wrote a sudoku “editor”

          I put that in quotes because I had a grid that could be navigated, arrows moved, storing the numbers, had number entry down. And when it was time to implement the solver, I learned the hard way what p vs np is.

      • @thejml@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 day ago

        I did that but made it return success before it got to the notes. You had to scroll to get to the notes, but it looked innocuous before that.

        • @linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          118 hours ago

          I would just rebuild something in my head like this every time.

          While i < n; k=k+(k*r); i++;

          You’d think I could remember k(1+r)^n but when you posted, it looked as alien as it felt decades ago.

          • @VintageGenious@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            417 hours ago

            The use of for makes sense.

            k=0; for (i=0; i<n; i++) k=k+f(i); is the same as k=\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} f(i)

            and

            k=1; for (i=0; i<n; i++) k=k*f(i); is the same as k=\prod_{i=0}^{n-1} f(i)

            In our case, f(i)=1+r and k=1; for (i=0; i<n; i++) k*(1+r); is the same as k=\prod_{i=0}^{n-1} (1+r) = (1+r)^n

            All of that just to say that exponentiation is an iteration of multiplication, the same way that multiplication is an iteration of addition

      • @BluesF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        222 hours ago

        What always annoyed me was having to draw charts by hand. Just let me put the data in a computer for god’s sake, the rest of the working is there… I did actually write a python function for one of my assignments which was fine, but they told me not to do it for the exam.