It’s still not earning you money to spend electricity because you still have to pay the transfer fee which is around 6 cents / kWh but it’s pretty damn cheap nevertheless, mostly because of the excess in wind energy.

Last winter because of a mistake it dropped down to negative 50 cents / kWh for few hours, averaging negative 20 cents for the entire day. People were literally earning money by spending electricity. Some were running electric heaters outside in the middle of the winter.

  • KillingTimeItself
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 month ago

    thermal storage is kind of complicated and sucks a little bit, probably.

    You can still do the heating thing, using your home as a thermal battery for example. You could also put a large thermal mass within your home, thousands of gallons of water (for example) directly integrating a thermal battery and optimally using it probably just isn’t as viable as not worrying about it and doing something else.

    • @AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It doesn’t have to be complicated, or the complexity is related to the use case. Does not need water or moving parts.

      Consider a single radiator in a house. You only need storage sufficient to use that radiator for one day. And it doesn’t matter too much if it can’t cover extreme temperatures, as long as it is sufficient to cover peak prices most of the time

      I finally found one. Why aren’t there choices like

      Edit to circle back to the goal: now I can move toward cleaner energy by electrifying my house. I can save energy/money by using the most efficient heating technology. If there was thermal storage, I could save even more money with “time of use” metering and the utility can shift their load to make up for the peakiness of sources like solar. If I installed solar on my roof, I could potentially heat my house entirely with “free” energy

      • KillingTimeItself
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        yeah, but if you’re not doing it in a complicated manner you could just stick an IBC tote full of water in the middle of your home and it would provide a similar effect.

        Personally i would probably just install a ground loop, and then use that to provide a source for heating and cooling, it’s also very consistent year round, though if you live in an area of deep frost lines, or permafrost, it’s probably going to be more exciting.

        • @AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          11 month ago

          Unfortunately a ground loop can be expensive, especially for those of us in urban areas.

          I read an analysis once that you could never make back the cost on energy saved. Whether or not that’s always true, I know I live in a high cost area with a yard that a drill couldn’t get to, cris-crossed with 80 years of utilities.

          • KillingTimeItself
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            that’s true, though to be fair i’d be the one installing it, i’m not paying other people to dig a hole lol.