Tldr: Bangladesh 🇧🇩 not doing so hot right now. Thoughts as a diaspora imperial core desi who lives a very comfortable life.

I feel really immature right about now. For a good while I just kept denying the color revolution hints to the point where even my very lib Dad was able to point them out. Feel like such a complete jackass, it just feels so fucking different when you’re in the moment and it’s your country down the line. That doesn’t mean I don’t have the same solidarity for all global south nations but this one just felt so personal. What’s happening in Bangladesh right now seems like nothing compared to the horrific struggle that West Asia has endured, but I guess I’m joining the club. doomjak

But yeah, they literally took over my country and there’s nothing I, a diaspora bengali, can do about it. Sometimes it feels like I have survivors guilt, that I got out of the country and immigrated to the imperial core (well my parents did) where I could live a far more comfortable life while a lot of my peers even here in the US are living much harder lives. omori-miserable

This is also compounded by the fact that I live in a white picket fence neighborhood where every neighborhood family are Trumpers or respectful Kamala-ists who are just “simple folk” out raising their family. My dad recently hanged up an American flag and a Bangladeshi flag on our lawn and now I’m just sick even thinking about it. disgost I might just tell my dad to take it american flag down if not both (he keeps telling me there’s some homeowner association “law” that you have to have the USian flag alongside other flags). The only thing that really cheers me up besides treats is Yahya Sinwar and the axis of resistance taking Israel down screw by screw.

Fuck the USA. I will never forget this moment in my entire fucking life. I just feel very off right now and this was my vent post. Part of me wishes that this wasn’t a takeover, but that part of me is slowly going away every passing second.

  • silkroadtraveler
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ok multiple things CAN be true at the same time:

    • the protests were organic, not military led (didn’t see any evidence for that) and tied to legitimate grievances with the PM
    • a US-aligned politician positioned themselves to become the interim leader without support
    • the army opportunistically positioned itself to support the students after they saw the groundswell of support the movement was getting

    It’s a massive stretch to think this is some sinister US plot. The US has huge bureaucratic hurdles to pulling off shit like this in compressed timelines like the protest movement. The Biden admin has NOT been a fan of interventionism or active interventionism in general outside of direct Russia or China relations. It’s doubtful anyone with authority in DC even knew what was going on much less authorized the CIA to energize a coup that would piss off India, who the US is courting btw. Not even considering what it would take for the US to proactively PLAN and execute something like this.

    • Wertheimer [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The Biden admin has NOT been a fan of interventionism or active interventionism in general outside of direct Russia or China relations.

      Secret Pakistan Cable Documents U.S. Pressure to Remove Imran Khan

      “All will be forgiven,” said a U.S. diplomat, if the no-confidence vote against Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan succeeds.

      . . .

      The U.S. State Department encouraged the Pakistani government in a March 7, 2022, meeting to remove Imran Khan as prime minister over his neutrality on the Russian invasion of Ukraine, according to a classified Pakistani government document obtained by The Intercept.

      • silkroadtraveler
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Diplomatic pressure is COMPLETELY different from covert action or covert influence. Every nation exerts diplomatic pressure.

        • TheKanzler [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          A secret meeting between US State Dept. actors and the Pakistani ambassador to the US, in which the US threatened “tough times ahead” for Pakistan if they didn’t remove the PM the US didn’t like isn’t intervention? It’s not covert? Get the fuck outta here lmao

          • silkroadtraveler
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Newsflash: confidential diplomatic meetings between diplomats (it’s their job) take place every day all over the world. Covert influence campaigns that would authorize, coordinate, and execute a political campaign must be authorized at the highest levels. If you think any bureaucrat working at the NSC or in the WH was gonna risk their hide authorizing such a campaign in Bangladesh, you are delusional and obviously have no clue what you’re talking about.

            • TheKanzler [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              25
              ·
              4 months ago

              Famously, the US has never authorized covert actions in foreign states. And in the cases they were caught, they were totally punished

              You call me delusional, and yet this is the kind of shit you spew out

            • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              If you think any bureaucrat working at the NSC or in the WH was gonna risk their hide authorizing such a campaign in Bangladesh, you are delusional

              Risk their hide? The US executive branch tries this all the time. No one is losing their position over backing a failed overthrow of a state in the periphery.

              Name one time when this happened.

            • hello_hello [comrade/them]@hexbear.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              NSC or in the WH was gonna risk their hide authorizing such a campaign in Bangladesh

              I mean you’re talking about a country who funds the Israeli genocide of Palestine in full view of the entire world. What shame do you think Western infiltrators have? You do know that they did the same genocide funding in the Bangladesh liberation war with Pakistan?

    • hello_hello [comrade/them]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It’s a massive stretch to think this is some sinister US plot. The US has huge bureaucratic hurdles to pulling off shit like this in compressed timelines like the protest movement. The Biden admin has NOT been a fan of interventionism or active interventionism in general outside of direct Russia or China relations. It’s doubtful anyone with authority in DC even knew what was going on much less authorized the CIA to energize a coup that would piss off India, who the US is courting btw. Not even considering what it would take for the US to proactively PLAN and execute something like this.

      This is literally what I thought at first until I realized all the liberal brainworms that being a diaspora Bengali comes with were working overtime here and I was inhaling some copium.

      Even if you are right, there is no denying that the military junta leaves Bangladesh to be much more suceptible to US meddling than if Sheikh Hasina resigned and the government still stayed in place with moderate to high labor concessions. Their [CIA color revolt. Industrial complex] guy is president, an old ass capitalist banker who loves America and hates India.

      Also the US has kept its eyes on Bangladesh for decades, they didn’t plan this in just a week in the same way Euromaiden or Sunflower revolutions weren’t adhoc genius schemes. The US takes advantage of these situations as they play out through foreign infiltration either via diaspora communities or NGOs (or more systemically as others have pointed out through the dollar economy). This isn’t a “partisan politics” thing this is a Yankee takeover.

      • silkroadtraveler
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I still haven’t seen any compelling evidence that this was US backed. If anything Hasina is an example of generational wealth and power who wasn’t doing anything for the working class in her four terms of office.

      • silkroadtraveler
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I have looked into it and don’t deny they were atrocious and pernicious. I just don’t see the fingerprints of one here.

        • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Typical lib. Claim to know all about color revolutions of the past, but refuse to accept the ones happening now. What did you think of the coup in Bolivia while it was happening? No evidence of the US there?

    • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      You are spelling out in your bullet points just how coincidentally favorable to the US it all is. You’d have to lack all pattern recognition to consider that the hegemon has contingency plans for when something like this starts to happen.

      Sounds like PM Sheikh Hasina turned into an autocrat and a protest movement gained enough momentum to cause her to resign.

      Autocrats are everywhere. The difference is that in some places, the protest movements have a much harder time reaching that critical point, and in some places, they have a much easier time of it.