• @Death_Equity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 month ago

    Depends on the aircraft if it has gas or hydraulic shock absorbers. Some lightweight aircraft just have torsion based shock absorption.

      • @mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        Glancing at Wikipedia, all hydraulic shock absorbers seem to use pneumatic compression. The oil is mostly a mechanical linkage, lubricant, and heat sink. I expect a liquid-only design could work, in a coilover monotube, but the spring would be taking all the compression, while the loose piston moving through oil simply resists change and smooths out the motion. There’s just not much reason to avoid adding a floating piston and some gas at the bottom of that. Underwater applications, maybe.

      • @Death_Equity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        It is done by allowing fluid to flow through passages between chambers separated with a piston. Your car’s shocks and struts work the same way. There are also ones with external reservoir that may allow for more travel or that can be pressurized to alter resistance.

          • @Death_Equity@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 month ago

            The fluid pushes on a reservoir of nitrogen that keeps the plane from bottoming out. It is a progressive pressure system, so it gets harder to move the more force is applied.

            • @CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Ah! Yes, you didn’t mention the pneumatic component. I thought you just meant between two bodies of oil, which would only provide damping and some added moment.