Our findings reveal widespread support for climate action. Notably, 69% of the global population expresses a willingness to contribute 1% of their personal income, 86% endorse pro-climate social norms and 89% demand intensified political action. Countries facing heightened vulnerability to climate change show a particularly high willingness to contribute. Despite these encouraging statistics, we document that the world is in a state of pluralistic ignorance, wherein individuals around the globe systematically underestimate the willingness of their fellow citizens to act.

This suggests that actions which provide social proof that large numbers of people are interested in action (eg: a mass march) are likely to spur further action.

  • bleistift2@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    69% of the global population expresses a willingness to contribute 1% of their personal income

    Giving money is easing. Not eating meat and not flying to vacations and not using a car and not importing Avocados and not buying a new phone every year aren’t.

    People are willing to endorse climate action as long as it doesn’t affect them.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is a global survey; most of the world isn’t flying or eating much meat.

    • pajn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s very different doing those things willingly when all options are still there around you and a lot of other people are doing it anyway. And being in support of policies to reduce for example meat eating for everyone.

  • thefattman@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    That map is interesting for Canada and the US…

    Only 30-40% of people think they should contribute 1% or less of their income to fix the problem. But 70-80% think we and the government should do more about it.

      • Sonori@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        What counts as a fuckton of taxes?

        No seriously, in the US you pay half to a third of what you would have paid between the thirties and the nineties depending on income bracket. If your rich you pay two thirds of what you did in the seventies. If your a major corporation you pay just two fifths of what you did in the sixties.

        I get taxes feel expensive, but even just compared to the historical rate in the US you pay a fraction of what was normal for a few generations ago. Compared to other western nations in Europe or for instance Canada, the difference is even more stark.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Canada is sus af with the tax revenue. Our roads are crumbling, hospitals closing, schools underfunded, antiquated military, and yet we spend so much in taxes.

      • Sonori@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        My first guess is someone isn’t paying their fair share and leaving it to less affluent individuals to pick up the slack.

  • Nakedmole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The majority of people are not the problem. Politicians, big corporations and billionaires are.