• Cunnysseur@burggit.moeOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah back in 2019.

      Countries responded and I don’t think it went anywhere.

      Here’s the US response

      In the United States, federal law provides that it is illegal to create, possess, or distribute a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture or painting, that depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and is obscene. However, visual depictions (CGI, anime, etc.) where there is not a “real” child are typically protected by the First Amendment (unless the visual depictions are obscene)

      Japan

      Japan therefore proposes to exclude “audio representations” and “written or printed materials” from the third sentence of paragraph 61. "Furthermore, for the reasons explained above, whether criminal penalties should be imposed, even if the case involves pornography of a non-existent child, it needs to be carefully considered. Japan proposes to add “to the extent that it represents an existing child” at the end of paragraph 61.

  • HappyPanda@burggit.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They could literally end both of those things if they actually gave a damn. It doesn’t help their profits though. It costs very little to ban lolis, and they probably consider that a PR win for most of the population. So their reasoning checks out from a sinister villain perspective anyway.