• Blass Rose@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yeah, this is why when they were BEGGING people to sign up for the AI beta I kept telling them to shove it. I know it’ll never be good enough to replace me actually reading the sources myself. Like those smart results that would highlight conveniently around the words that say that the commonly held belief is false or just give completely wrong info. And if the topic I want info about is involving compilation or any sort of logic, I know AI would screw that up, too. Ultimately it’s just easier to do it myself, instead of having to fix whatever info it gives back.

  • Sloan the Serval@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I mean, Google Search has had issues with reinterpreting, ignoring and even outright replacing search terms with “synonyms” that are only tangentially relevant for a few years now. I’m not surprised their AI is doing the same thing, and I guarantee it’s “working as intended” and that Google won’t do anything to fix it.