• Dragonstaff@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is a reasonable reply to a nonsense statement. Signal is plenty secure for us and whatever we need to do with it. It is not secure enough, nor authorized, for classified information.

    • Hawke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I dunno if I would consider “user error” as a security flaw in the software.

      • feannag@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        No, but it still isn’t secure enough for classified information. The protocol is probably fine, but the weak point is the device. And the device can be compromised. Devices rated for classified systems never touch the public internet which makes them significantly less susceptible to being compromised.