ROME, March 22 (Reuters) - Negotiations on a potential contract between Elon Musk’s satellite internet operator Starlink and the Italian government have stalled, reflecting broader geopolitical tensions, Italy’s defence minister said on Saturday.

  • nahostdeutschland@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Every major powerblock will build their own constellation. The need is there, but there is no way that the militaries will give that amount of control to the USA & Musk now. Musk switched of starlink in a critical phase for Ukraine and that was the dead of the program for militaries outside of the USA

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      60 minutes ago

      No, because for 99% of applications byoubdont need low latency satellite internet. A single geostationary satellite works wonders

  • DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Fuck Starlink. Europe is working on its own alternative and it would be actual traitor behaviour to still make a Starlink contract. If anything it should be banned.

    Fuck Elon Musk. I want to see him crying and poor. Or „worse“. ☺️🪦💀

      • DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        As a German I hear you. Internet is an actual embarrassment over here. I’m on a 50k Mbit connection and that’s the most they can offer me. 100k is out of question, they told me to ask again in 2028.

        Even some African nations probably have better internet than this. Germany is the third richest country by gdp btw.

          • DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            Yes. I mean…. Name a developed one besides South Africa.

            Africa is currently a shithole.

          • DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            24 hours ago

            Lmao. I wish. I am on a 50 MBIT (not GBIT) connection. And yes. I want more. Please give me just a few crumbs.

              • DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                21 hours ago

                Oh I’m sorry I might be kind of an idiot in IT stuff. What I meant was 50.000 megabytes. Which is poor as hell. Even for developing countries.

                Really, all I know is that my connection sucks and that I’m on the lowest posisible speed.

                • Da Bald Eagul@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  No, I think you mean 50 megabits per second. I’d consider 100mbit (megabits) average, 50 000 megabits, which is equal to 50 gigabits (or ⅛th of 50 000 megabytes) would be ludicrously unnecessarily much for a residential connection today, and it’d be hard to find hardware to support it.

                  Just for reference:

                  • Modern DDR5 Random Access Memory can be bought for 8000 mega transfers per second, which is pretty high end. According to wikipedia, this is roughly 64 gigabytes per second.

                  • PCIe 4 SSDs can reach up to 7GB/s or 56 gigabit/s of data transfer speeds. PCIe 5 drives cap out at roughly 16GB/s or about 128gb/s.

                  I don’t think your internet would be quite that fast, or at least you wouldn’t be complaining about it 😅

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Fiber needs to be run to the towers. It’s easier to install more towers but it’s still an expense.

            • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Wireless trunking can do 10GBs . Fiber does 800GBs. Chaining more towers means more are funneled through that last 10GBs link.

                • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  StarLink does fiber back haul from base stations. So it’s either your Telco spending the money or StarLink. Your Telco doesn’t want to spend the money because it comes from customers and would require rate hikes that are regulated.

                  Whereas StarLink is spending its investor’s money.