From the linked patch notes:

  • Reduced polling rate while the Steam Frame Limiter is active to save additional power. This can save up to 6% on battery life when running at 30fps in a low-power game like HL2
  • graymess@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    Glad to see improvements like this on the software level, but it seems unlikely to be utilized much. Any game that runs on low power probably can reach 60fps. 6% battery saved does not seem like a great trade-off for halved frame rate.

    • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 days ago

      I constantly see people talking about playing things like Balatro on their deck that certainly doesn’t need more than 30fps.

      Seems super useful for games like that on a flight

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      Think nes, snes, and Sega game emulation. No reason to run over 30fps. Also any of those click choice games and dating sim games where nothing ever really moves.

      • timo_timboo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        Think nes, snes, and Sega game emulation. No reason to run over 30fps.

        Why would you run such games at half the framerate? 60fps was the norm back then.

        • amelore@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Was it? afaik PAL was 50Hz but 25fps, and NTSC was 60Hz at 30fps. Two periods per frame because of interlacing or something like that.

          • timo_timboo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            No, not quite. 60fps (or 50fps for PAL regions) was basically always the target for 2D games rendered at 240p, because it was easily achievable with the hardware and looked way better.

            When 3D games started to appear with the release of the PS1, Saturn and N64, 60fps was often out of the question because the hardware wasn’t powerful enough.

            Interlacing doesn’t really have anything to with that. Interlacing just means that of the 480 lines of resolution, only half get shown on screen every frame (always the even or uneven ones). Since the image gets rendered in 480p anyway, it doesn’t matter whether or not the game gets rendered at 60fps or not.

            Except when using field rendering, which was popular on the PS2. There, only the lines that get shown that frame get rendered, which is why it only works at 60fps. Maybe that was what you were thinking about?

            • amelore@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Did some more reading, I was probably thinking of broadcast TV signals, which were 25 or 30 fps because one frame is two fields. and I wrongly assumed CRT TVs could only do one thing, but consoles mainly did progressive video.

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    I was happy for a split second thinking it was a new steam deck they’re releasing. :/

    • orize@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 days ago

      This is even better, because they dont have to make a new one. Which would cause a mass exodus because every person that already have one will want to buy a new one.

      • penquin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        From a business standpoint, wouldn’t that be better for valve? Wouldn’t they make more money?