Making up arguments to justify their BS.

  • Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Oh look. Another asshole crying victim when they’re being treated for the asshole they are.

  • imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    they slash our tires. We use their bodies as replacement for tires. I don’t see how we are being inhumane???

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    YDI, the article was about Israeli use of human shields.

    Remember to upvote the post for being on topic!

  • imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    ???

    Making up shit? How isn’t it exactly what you wrote?

    You literally are defending the use of human shields.

    • Biskii@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      They defend Israel constantly. I wouldn’t waste your time, but if you’re going to I want you to at least know what you are getting into

      • imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I mean… He was literally defending using human people as mine detectors.

        I realized what scum I was responding to, just wanted to make it clear what he was saying to people who weren’t really paying attention to the posts he made

    • Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.winOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      That is not a defence of human shields. There are 2 war crimes being described in that article and you’re only allowed to talk about the one.

  • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    You didn’t even say it was bad to use human shields at any point. Now I don’t think you should be banned for it but it says a lot about your ethical standards and what it says is not good.

      • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Absolutely! I just imagine that people want to be morally and intellectually consistent, so I think it’s important to point out when they are not.

        Of course maybe they think Hamas using “human shields” is fine too? Doubt it but at least that wouldn’t be hypocritical

      • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        So you do denounce the IDF for using human shields? It’s unclear when you seem to only focus on the portion of the blame that lies with Hamas

        • Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.winOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          8 hours ago

          It is not unclear. It requires a basic understanding of words which you seem to finally have figured out.

          Jeopardizing civilian lives, either by placing booby-traps or using them as shields are both warcrimes.

          My stance has always been that all the violence is BS. I just hate that lemmy.world blatantly gives Hamas a pass.

          • imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            A metaphor.

            You in this thread:

            both sides are committing war crimes but in only complaining about one, how don’t you get that I’m mad at both of them!

            You in that thread:

            Yeah guys! I’m just saying ALL LIVES MATTER so why are all these BLM people mad?

            I’m just saying why are black people getting a pass?

            You, unironically.

            It’s a poor metaphor because the genocide being committed intentionally is worse

          • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            It is not unclear. It requires a basic understanding of words which you seem to finally have figured out.

            If it only required a “basic” understanding why would so many people have been making the same point to you?

            If a headline says “x group did a crime” and someone responds “y group are criminals” it is not at all obvious what this person’s stance on x group is. If anything this reads like a deflection onto y group, so someone might infer that the responder supports x group or at least is more concerned about y group.

            If the person says “yes, x group did do a crime but let’s not forget y group are criminals too” then it is super clear what this person means. If you omit a response to the actual topic at hand you have no place getting mad when people assume you don’t care about that.