Hunter Biden’s lawyer filed an ethics complaint in the House of Representatives on Friday against Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene for reaching a “new level of abhorrent behavior” after she displayed sexually explicit pictures of him during a hearing Wednesday.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately she’s protected by congressional immunity. If only people in power didn’t create special rules for themselves.

      • DoctorTYVM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Only when she says it on the floor as a congresswoman. She doesn’t have carte blanche to say whatever she wants anywhere else.

        And since she sent out his nudes in a mailer, he can sue

    • Compactor9679@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hubter doing porn and getting out… Doing drugs from the crack of a prostitute that he paied with your money… Hahahh

  • Poppa_Mo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Again. What the fuck does Hunter Biden matter, and why is this Scarecrow looking scab insist on wasting our money on this garbage?

    • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      hunter biden matters to republicans because he’s the only thing they can hang on joe biden, who has been honestly masterful in the way he’s navigated the late and post-pandemic.

    • Compactor9679@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yea… Who cares of all the money he took? Fucking crack head good for nothing… Doing coce at the white house… My God

    • exohuman@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Taking a private citizens’s nudes and sharing it against their will in congress may go against the spirit of that clause. I would love to see how this holds up in court.

  • krzschlss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    One side uses a distraction. It gets full media attention. People get involved. People get angry. People start blaming each other. Then, the other side counters with a distraction. It gets even more heated. This time it’s personal. There might even be consequences. Maybe…

    Why the fuck are you eating all this rotting shit those out of touch, self-absorbed, greedy, attention-seeking Partisans are serving you?

          • krzschlss@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m not a US citizen. I don’t care for your celebrity obsessions and gossip. I just don’t understand why shit like this is making news, let alone being part of your political life. Or lawcrafting… Let me remind you, we are not talking about making laws, we are talking about naked pictures of some dude…

              • krzschlss@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yes, and by giving it any kind of attention you’re basically promoting this kind of behavior in your political institutions. And then, after few years you wonder why your political landscape is full of reality-tv-show clowns. It’s “Keeping up with Kardassians” but with diplomatic immunity. And I’m talking about both of your political spectra, not just the one easy target.