Yeah idk. The goal is to express that 2025 is happening no matter who wins, since the SCOTUS can do it by fiat. So this is just, idk, a doodle. Obviously even for my “people remember things because their eyes are bleeding” color schjeme this is too much but idk how to do it. whatever.

Please share your thoughts.

  • JoeByeThen [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
    11·
    4 months ago

    So, my style is dramatically less busy/eye bleed than yours, but I would go with the original two path meme showing smaller project2025s on each side and then put a small Crowder change my mind cut out on the side of the road before the fork. With something like “You need a plan beyond Vote, change my mind.”

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.netOPEnglish
        2·
        4 months ago

        I didn’t do that one on purpose but i like having formatting and spelling mistakes the highlight the chaos and contribute to the overall destabilizing imagery. Kind of one of those zen things where your master hits you with a stick until you become enlightened. It’s intended to be disorienting and uncomfortable.

    • Leon_Grotsky [comrade/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
      3·
      4 months ago

      I think both font and red, I think the font should echo (but not be the exact same as) the font on the side bars, and the drop shadow should be cyan/pink or the same yellow as the road. The red just pops out too much and clashes in a bad way with the rest of the palette. The yellow is fine because it’s more in line with this “Electric Pastel” (is there a legitimate name for this kind of pallete?), is needed to draw attention to the root “2 paths” meme, and also has a kind of red-herring symbolism.

  • Sickos [they/them, it/its]@hexbear.netEnglish
    6·
    4 months ago

    Nuked two roads meme. Both sides dark. Left side is a strike though “shidding and farding”. Right side is a strike through “peeing my pants”. Garish text with the actual message haphazardly over both. “SC says disapproval of Project 2025 is unconstitutional”, “SC says project 2025 is constitutional”.

    Central message: “VOTGING IS NOT ENOUGH YOU NEED TO BUY A GUN”

  • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
    3·
    4 months ago

    I guess it’s just a different idea entirely but why not Project 2025 on one side, Project 2029 on the other, and the caption is simply “Buy a gun, join a revolutionary organization”