@Waffelson@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world • 3 months agoPeople who use distros without systemd, why do you do this?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square116fedilinkarrow-up1344arrow-down124
arrow-up1320arrow-down1imagePeople who use distros without systemd, why do you do this?lemmy.world@Waffelson@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world • 3 months agomessage-square116fedilink
minus-square@redcalcium@lemmy.institutelinkfedilink26•3 months agoI use distros with systemd but damn, pretty soon it’s not gnu/linux anymore, it’ll be systemd/linux. systemd already manages services, bootloader, dns and networking. Maybe they’ll replace coreutils next and the transition is completed.
minus-square@pete_the_cat@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilinkEnglish5•3 months agoLinux is becoming more akin to BSD with the introduction of systemd.
minus-square@3w0@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilink6•edit-23 months ago more akin to BSD with the introduction of system One difference: BSDs are coherent.
minus-squareancap sharklink1•3 months agoI don’t find that to be a problem. Systemd manages my system, I would not prefer having 10+ tools to do the same
minus-squareRichardlinkfedilinkEnglish3•3 months agoThat’s the very opposite of the Unix philosophy though.
I use distros with systemd but damn, pretty soon it’s not gnu/linux anymore, it’ll be systemd/linux. systemd already manages services, bootloader, dns and networking. Maybe they’ll replace coreutils next and the transition is completed.
Linux is becoming more akin to BSD with the introduction of systemd.
One difference: BSDs are coherent.
I don’t find that to be a problem. Systemd manages my system, I would not prefer having 10+ tools to do the same
That’s the very opposite of the Unix philosophy though.
And?
Systemd is already 10+ interdependant tools