• @masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -14 months ago

    Homie,

    We are not friends.

    You mean like this? Oops, sorry… wrong war. It’s not my fault - when you get into the grisly details they all start looking the same.

    The United States wasn’t on an ethnic cleansing campaign

    Ooooh… you completely got me there. The millions dead in the Congo thanks to Belgium exploitation? Perfectly okay because it wasn’t a clear-cut case of “ethnic cleansing.” The millions starved to death in Bengal due to British colonialist policies during WW2? Perfectly fine because it wasn’t a clear-cut case of “ethnic cleansing.”

    If only Hitler had you around to handle his PR for him, eh?

    Which had had which major defeats associated with it?

    I’m just going to go ahead and assume it’s also a complete mystery to you why the vaunted US military failed so abysmally in Afghanistan, eh?

    It’s only a mystery to you and your ilk - why do you think that is?

    • @Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      My Lai was not an ethnic cleansing campaign. It was not directed by the White House or the Pentagon. It was a massacre that had an attempted cover up.

      Is it really that hard to understand that something can be illegal, unethical, and immoral, and not be ethnic cleansing?

      British colonialist policies during WW2

      ’m just going to go ahead and assume it’s also a complete mystery to you why the vaunted US military failed so abysmally in Afghanistan, eh?

      This discussion is on vietnam, but cool.

      • @masquenox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -24 months ago

        My Lai was not an ethnic cleansing

        Oh… you didn’t get this the first time around. Here… let me help you along and repost it for you because you sure look like this is going to take you a lot of effort to get.

        Ooooh… you completely got me there. The millions dead in the Congo thanks to Belgium exploitation? Perfectly okay because it wasn’t a clear-cut case of “ethnic cleansing.” The millions starved to death in Bengal due to British colonialist policies during WW2? Perfectly fine because it wasn’t a clear-cut case of “ethnic cleansing.”

        Also, why bring up My Lai? There was nothing unique about My Lai - except for the fact that it ended up being reported in the US media because one chopper crew decided to grow a backbone and put a stop to it (for once). For the US military in Vietnam, My Lai was Tuesday.

        This discussion is on vietnam

        So do tell… how does a military end up being completely broken by a (supposedly) “inferior” enemy without actually having lost any decisive battles?

        I’d hate to think what would have actually happened if the US had lost a clear-cut battle in Vietnam - the entire US may just have imploded in on itself due to shock.

        • @Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          24 months ago

          I could have worded that better, my apologies there. The fact that someone stopped it, I think really is a difference.

          I never once said anything about the Vietcong being inferior.

          I’m done here, but I do suggest you go and do some more reading. Maybe watch Ken Burns Vietnam documentary to get started with.

          • @masquenox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -24 months ago

            I never once said anything about the Vietcong being inferior.

            This is not about what you said or didn’t say. The US empire is a fundamentally white supremacist empire - no different than the fundamentally white supremacist empires that gave birth to it - and therefore views anyone it wishes to subjugate, exploit and/or exterminate as “inferior.”

            but I do suggest you go and do some more reading.

            You first.