Note:

I swapped the original article at the request of a mod to from a source deemed more reliable, but to avoid confusion when reading the comment section prior to this edit, here is the link to the original article. I chose the Relief Web source listed by some who commented. Cheers!

  • ???@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yes

    So yes that a bad title necessarily means the article is biased?

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes. Because the article exists as a tuple of both the title and the content, and the title dominates. The title poisons the article

      • ???@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think the truth dies only if you don’t read the full article in this case, as is expected of people before posting here…

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I can’t believe most people are reading the article before commenting in lemmy

          • ???@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            I don’t believe that either, which is why I sometimes ask them if they have.

            Sadly one cannot force anyone to read… one can only expect others to do it.