• Xer0@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Nothing wrong with accepting that both sides of anything have good and bad shit going on. I couldn’t imagine just blindly following one side 100% even when they can also do questionable stuff.

        • samus12345@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Sure, but the problem is that rather than arguing the finer points of how to combat climate change, for example, we have to argue about whether truth is truth.

      • WhiteHawk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes, because you’re so blinded by your indoctrination that you can’t accept the flaws of “your” side.

        • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          “Climate change exists”

          “Religion shouldn’t allow governments to prevent basic healthcare needs”

          “January 6 was a failed insurrection”

          These are the things that the right calls indoctrination.

          And the hard left calls not important enough to bother voting.