You can’t read, can you? I’ve made this very easy for you, and you’re still getting it wrong.
It is not based on a strict delineation between oppressor and oppressed, and it did not end with Marx. His ideas, alone, are outdated, and that’s why the science has evolved with time.
Also, no matter how convenient it would be for you, I am not a tankie. :)
Dispute its axioms for me, then. Refute dialectical materialism, or historical materialism, as unscientific.
Sorry, but conveniently dividing ALL of history in “these people exploit and these people are exploited” doesn’t sound axiomatic at all.
Whatever, your tankie mind seems brainwashed to the core and you won’t be able to see beyond an infalible image of Prophet Marx
You can’t read, can you? I’ve made this very easy for you, and you’re still getting it wrong.
It is not based on a strict delineation between oppressor and oppressed, and it did not end with Marx. His ideas, alone, are outdated, and that’s why the science has evolved with time.
Also, no matter how convenient it would be for you, I am not a tankie. :)
I’ll give you one more chance.