• @pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yes. You have no authority to tell them any moral stance is wrong, especially telling people they can’t kill obvious hateful cultists who are a threat to the community and have proven it by killing actually innocent people. You have NO business saying that in a modern society AT ALL.

    No one has the authority to tell someone that. Not even you. And if you claim it I will pit you right back in your place, far below actual decent people, where you belong. You will get what you give and you won’t like it.

    I’m not trying to make light of the tragedy that happened to the original victim,

    Well you are, and you make light of countless tragedies both violent and nonviolent across this nation and across this planet when you open your stupid fucking mouth and insinuate something so evil. And until you stop, my stance won’t change.

    But if someone is arguing to eliminate due process because of this case

    The only one who took away his right to due process was him, and he did it of his own volition by being dumb enough to fire at cops. When you shoot at ANYONE unprovoked, you have to accept the very high risk of being killed for your trouble and therefore never seeing a trial because that is how reality works.

    Self-defense is a fundamental human right that supercedes any right you claim an aggressor to have.

    Get over it you don’t like it.

    And stop making me defend pigs

    • @rbhfd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      Final reply, because I feel this not going anywhere.

      I, or the person I was defending, was not talking about this specific situation. Of course they have the right to self defense. I explicitly mentioned that before two comments ago.

      I’m also not trying to defend the killer or feel sad at all he got killed by the police.

      All my replies were aimed at the comment from CoffeeJunkie who apparently was advocating for the police to be judge, jury and executioner because that’s cheaper. That’s a major simplification and I’m sure that’s not what they meant, but that’s how I, and probably others, interpreted it and why I chose to go against it.

      Again, I’m done arguing with you. You’re resorting to ad hominem attacks because you’re misunderstanding what I’m saying.