• Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Drive throughs are often against policy because if you get assigned an emergency call while in line, depending on the construction of the drive through and how close other vehicles are to you, you might not be able to leave immediately.

    • LethalSmack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      While that’s a fair point, it’s not the only example of planning ahead. I’m sure there’s plenty of other ways than the ones I came up with in a few seconds.

      They could also pick a drive throughs that have enough room to leave the line. Less common in cities but they’re still there.

      Edit: I’d also like to point out that their lights and sirens are designed specifically to get people’s attention and get them moved out of the way. More difficult if you’re trying to get a vehicle 10 cars up to move but it’s not like they’re stuck waiting like the rest of us would be.

      • Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Haha sorry I kind of latched on to one of your examples, you did give some other fair options. There were some exceptions made over COVID when dine in was closed but it’s harder to make policies when some drive throughs are good and others aren’t. And your view on efficacy of lights and sirens are a tad optimistic (including the P.A.)

        That said, I do think that they could walk further and it’s bad optics to be parked blocking anything but a fire route as an emergency vehicle. And I’m probably going to get roasted by the fire fighters for saying that. And I’m not apologizing for the pun.